In the case of Mega, I'd trust them less than the typical one.
#Wuala web login code
There's many that are trustworthy and have the code to prove it. So yeah, dropbox and google drive are both obviously able to look at your data, but that doesn't preclude using other cloud storage providers. These three tiers make sense and at each one you sacrifice some usability (such as the web-interface being unusable at (c) I think) in exchange for security. You can a) let them keep the key and thus you can still reset your password etc, b) let them keep the key so you don't have to transfer it manually to all crashplan-using computers, but have it encrypted on their end with a password only you know (can't be reset), or c) provide your own key which they claim they'll never know. I note it partly because I really like their approach. I wouldn't trust them as much as either of the previous options, but I still think they're telling the truth. In both of these cases the encryption keys are not on the servers.Īn additional provider which claims to offer cloud storage/backup with zero-knowledge is Crashplan. It doesn't do syncing or have a free tier, but it's definitely trustable online storage. It's quite nice.Īnother service which is open source is Tarsnap. You can set syncs as between a subset of all devices, create an arbitrary number of syncs, and create some backups which aren't syncs too. It also has more features than Dropbox or Drive.
I definitely trust SpiderOak with my data. They assure strong zero-knowledge privacy and, while the client isn't technically open source, much of it is completely unobfuscated python.
0 kommentar(er)
